- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:47:39 +0200
- To: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, URI <uri@w3.org>, "hybi@ietf.org" <hybi@ietf.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Joseph A Holsten wrote: > ... > The only scheme I can think of that was defined as an IRI was XMPP > [RFC4622]. It actually makes more sense when you start with IRIs. If > that's what you need, please just do that. > ... Actually, that RFC *registers* a URI scheme; see <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4622#section-3>. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 06:48:29 UTC