On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 19:51 -0400, Daniel R. Tobias wrote: > On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > > > David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do > > you?. If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that > > would save it from the http black hole. > > It does seem to be an ideological position for some. Excuse me? By piggy-backing on http URIs, you can get easier, faster adoption with more user-friendly fallback behavior. To my mind that's an engineering concern -- not an idealogical position. -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 01:13:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:53 UTC