Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI from David Booth on 2009-10-13 (uri@w3.org from October 2009)

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:12:39 -0400
To: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1255396359.5481.10164.camel@dbooth-laptop>

On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 19:51 -0400, Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> 
> > David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do
> > you?.  If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that
> > would save it from the http black hole.
> 
> It does seem to be an ideological position for some.

Excuse me?  By piggy-backing on http URIs, you can get easier, faster
adoption with more user-friendly fallback behavior.   To my mind that's
an engineering concern -- not an idealogical position.  

-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 01:13:11 UTC