The suggested text sounds fine, but I'm not sure I understand the expected behavior of reserved but unresolvable "about" URIs. On Sep 18, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > The revised text I've suggested for section 5 is as follows: [...] > 5.1 Reserved "about" URIs [...] > Other specifications MAY reserve additional "about" URIs. > Applications attempting to resolve reserved "about" URIs that are > not defined to be resolvable, MAY treat such URIs as being > unreserved. Doesn't this defeat the purpose of reserving an unresolvable about URI? If applications can treat unresolvable "about" URIs (such as about:legacy-compat) as unreserved, what exactly is being reserved for them? -- Joseph Holsten http://josephholsten.com mailto:joseph@josephholsten.com tel:+1-918-948-6747Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 15:28:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:53 UTC