- From: Christophe Lauret <clauret@weborganic.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:02:06 +1100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
[Comment on the URI Template working draft]
Is there any particular reason why the current draft suggests that
variables typed as lists (marked with @) be expanded so that the
variable name is followed by a generated numbering?
The numbering scheme seems quite odd and specific (1-based with first
item unnumbered).
For example, in the case of the ? operator:
{?@list} ?list=val1&list2=val2&list3=val3
Why not simply expand it as:
?list=val1&list=val2&list=val3
This would still be a perfectly valid sequence of query parameters.
Or am I missing something obvious?
Christophe-
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 06:02:42 UTC