- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:42:40 -0400
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, URI <uri@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:07 PM, ashok malhotra<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Eran: > Trying to understand your proposal. > By 'abstract' do you mean URIs for which a representation cannot be > retrieved? > So, perhaps, a chair? > My assumption was that for such resources you want to retrieve the metadata. Quibble: In the case of a chair, you can't get metadata, since a chair isn't data. http://www.google.com/search?q=define:metadata This is why it's nice that Eran calls the description resource a "description resource" instead of a "metadata resource". LRDD is a compatible alternative to linked-data 303 nose-following, one that (like 303, as David Booth has pointed out) behaves uniformly without caring whether the resource is "data"-like or not - it means you don't have to ask or answer that question. I advocate using his terminology. Perhaps an alternative to a new URI scheme for hosts would be loop detection inside of LRDD? I think that's close to what you're saying. -Jonathan
Received on Sunday, 28 June 2009 16:43:28 UTC