- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:40:43 +0200
- To: uri@w3.org
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:24 +0200, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> Fwd'ing to uri@w3.org from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It >> would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation >> libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services. > Validator.nu does IRI reference validation for attributes that take them as value. http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ and other URI parser implementations are an option. submitting a URI would be easy, but the question is what to return: just a (URI|IRI|invalid) response, or some sort of parsing result that can be used to process the URI? the latter option might be interesting beyond mere validation, but then again URI parsing is such a low-level task that in most cases, people will probably prefer to have it as a local library, instead of using a web service. cheers, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814 dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:41:46 UTC