- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:40:43 +0200
- To: uri@w3.org
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:23:24 +0200, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>> Fwd'ing to uri@w3.org from the SW IG list. Can anyone here advise? It
>> would also be interesting to hear about the state of URI validation
>> libraries, even if they're not currently exposed as Web Services.
> Validator.nu does IRI reference validation for attributes that take them as value.
http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ and other URI parser implementations
are an option. submitting a URI would be easy, but the question is what
to return: just a (URI|IRI|invalid) response, or some sort of parsing
result that can be used to process the URI? the latter option might be
interesting beyond mere validation, but then again URI parsing is such a
low-level task that in most cases, people will probably prefer to have
it as a local library, instead of using a web service.
cheers,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@berkeley.edu - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool)
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 15:41:46 UTC