Re: IDNA and IRI document way forward

Erik van der Poel scripsit:

> There are a couple of new terms in this document: Legacy Extended IRIs
> (LEIRIs) and Hypertext References. The difference between LEIRIs and
> IRIs appears to be whether or not you %-escape certain characters,
> such as Space and Unicode Private Use characters. However, Space is an
> ASCII character, so one would expect this to be more related to URIs,
> which begs the question of why we don't have the term LEURI as well.

No need for it.  "LEIRI" is a new name for something that's been around
since the First Edition of XML 1.0.  Until now, the numerous W3C and
non-W3C specs have referred to one another to define it, and it's never
had a name of its own.  This has caused uncertainty in definition and
pointless dependencies.  In any case, nobody proposes using non-IRI
LEIRIs for anything; it's just that they are a physical possibility
in various places within XML, and getting the definition standardized
and in one place will enable a lot of standards rectification.

John Cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.

Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 20:11:24 UTC