Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >You've misunderstood. This would not apply to arbitrary hosts whose > >name starts with "wss". Please re-read > >http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/ > > What hosts would it apply to? One specific one? If it applies to > exactly one host, then I object to making the scheme rely on a central > server. We know from experience that this doesn't scale. There should be no requests to that server. It's similar to XML namespaces, which should never be dereferenced. But maybe you have a point. The mere occurrence of "http://wss.example.com/some/path" embedded in script in a web page will probably cause some (non-browser) agents to attempt to fetch the resource at that URL. Cheap spidering. -- JamieReceived on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 04:50:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:52 UTC