- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:50:54 +1200
- To: Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
My .02 - websock seems like a good balance... On 08/08/2009, at 10:52 AM, Chris Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 7, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote: >> >>> Julian Reschke wrote: >>> >>>> 1) What does a "ws" URI identify? >>> >>> Note also that ws is commonly used to denote Web Service. >> >> I think it's unlikely the "ws" family of formats and protocols will >> want to >> register their own URI scheme. That being said, how about "wsp" for >> WebSocket Protocol? > > As long as we are throwing out acronyms, my suggestion would be for > the simple "websocket" or maybe "websock" if bytes are considered > expensive. I'm a big fan of the mailto: link b/c it's easy to > understand what it means. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > -- > Chris Anderson > http://jchrisa.net > http://couch.io > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 8 August 2009 18:51:38 UTC