- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:24:07 +1100
- To: "Mike Schinkel" <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Jerome Louvel'" <contact@noelios.com>, <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, <uri@w3.org>, <rest-discuss@yahoogroups.com>
I didn't see any use cases in the original e-mail; did I miss something? An example or two tends to focus discussion well... Cheers, On 01/11/2008, at 12:59 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote: > Mark>> compelling use cases for this, but we haven't seen those yet > AFAIK. > > What classifies as a "compelling use-case" in your mind? > > -Mike Schinkel > President; NewClarity LLC > Organizer: Atlanta Web Entrepreneurs > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeschinkel > http://twitter.com/mikeschinkel > http://mikeschinkel.com > http://atlanta-web.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Nottingham > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 6:38 PM > To: Ian Hickson > Cc: Jerome Louvel; whatwg@lists.whatwg.org; uri@w3.org; > rest-discuss@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposing URI Templates for WebForms 2.0 > > > +1, although I'd say it a bit differently. > > Doing it in script precludes unintended reuse, e.g., for > accessibility, > search engines, and so forth; it's not a good solution > *if* there are compelling use cases for this, but we haven't seen > those yet > AFAIK. > > Cheers, > > > On 29/10/2008, at 6:20 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jerome Louvel wrote: >>> >>> Even though the URI template RFC is not finalized yet, we already >>> have a complete support for it, on the server-side, in the Restlet >>> framework. >>> We happily use them for our URI-based routing and I think they add a >>> lot of expressiveness while keeping a simple syntax. Usage example: >>> http://www.restlet.org/tutorial#part11 >>> >>> They are also supported in WADL, the RESTful description language, >>> and in the OpenSearch specification. Extending their usage to HTML >>> forms sounds like a logical and useful step. >> >> It seems to me like URI templates can be trivially done from script >> and from the server side already; given the poor >> backwards-compatibility story of URI templates, what do we gain from >> adding it to the language? >> >> -- >> Ian Hickson U+1047E ) >> \._.,--....,'``. fL >> http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ >> \ ;`._ ,. >> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- >> (,_..'`-.;.' >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 05:24:54 UTC