- From: Ben Ramsey <benramsey.lists@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:25:18 -0400
- To: URI <uri@w3.org>
I've combed through the list and can't find whether this has been previously discussed, so forgive me if I'm repeating something. I know that you can use a URI template to define a default value for a parameter (i.e. {foo=bar}), but has anyone discussed the use of a list of acceptable values for a parameter? Perhaps something like: {foo=[bar,baz,qux]} In this case, the only acceptable values for foo are bar, baz, and qux. Implementors would determine how to handle unacceptable values. If this has been discussed and decided against, what was the reasoning for rejecting this idea? -- Ben Ramsey http://benramsey.com/
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 07:48:53 UTC