- From: Clive D.W. Feather <clive@demon.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:32:34 +0100
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
Frank Ellermann said: >> In other contexts, I've assumed that # was meant to be encoded. > If that does the trick it could be simple enough for an erratum. I think it suffices. > Maybe there are other problems in the syntax, I didn't check it. I don't recall any others from a quick look-through. >> The tel URI scheme is using <opaque_part> rather than any form >> with an <authority>. > > Yes, my simplification was the general idea, no authority as in > "mailto", or optional as in "xmpp" is fine. The rest still has > to match the general syntax. Yes. >> "?" does *NOT* start a query, it is an uninterpreted character. > In the general syntax it starts a query, for URI schemes without > query "?" cannot be used as is before the fragment (if there is > a fragment). Apologies; I was reading 2396 and hadn't realized this had changed. In particular, this is a semantic change that isn't called out in 3986 appendix D. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 13:44:12 UTC