- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:30:29 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, uri@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 30 juin 2008 à 06:20, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> I believe many developers rely on the RFC definitions.
>
> I would be surprised if this were so, but I have no data to back my
> position.
Not reliable but can give hints on the frequency.
113 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+3986%22
25 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+3987%22
157 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+2732%22
318 942 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=url
139 989 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=uri
529 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=iri
25 011 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=rfc
605 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+2822%22
1 860 http://www.koders.com/default.aspx?s=%22RFC+822%22
--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 02:31:06 UTC