W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Comments on draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt, please

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:02:26 +0100
To: uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <fnrkmk$in8$1@ger.gmane.org>

Mike Brown wrote:
> I'm talking about when "%40" is used by URI producers to
> represent the main, special-purpose "@".

While mailto: consumers have no compelling reason to split
an address into LHS and RHS this could get tricky with the
regular expression in the mailto.uri.arpa NAPTR

Maybe mailto-bis should do something with the NAPTR, if it
mentions the %40 magic as proposed by you:
>| A mailto URI containing the percent-encoded octet "%40"
>| in place of "@" in the addr-spec may be a valid URI in
>| general, but does not conform to the mailto URI syntax.
>| Interpretation of such malformed mailto URIs is 
>| implementation-dependent, but consumers of such URIs
>| commonly regard them to be equivalent.

RFC 2368 was based on 1738, and apparently 1738 allowed to
percent-encode "@" where it's not reserved by the scheme.

The problem of the percent-encoded comma might be related
to your question (opposite issue, why not use comma as is)


Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 05:01:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC