Re: geo: uri scheme proposal

On 1/15/08, Erik Wilde <> wrote:
> Mark Baker wrote:
> > The authors requested permanent registration which requires more
> > review than does provisional registration.  Given the significant
> > issues that have been raised with the draft, I think it's fine that it
> > hasn't been registered yet.
> just as a clarification: this comment probably refers to the geo:
> scheme, which is something i had nothing to do with. it was proposed
> last year

Oops, I think I might have mixed up my Eri[c|k]s.  I was actually
referring to the jms: scheme championed by Eric Johnson.  My

Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 03:21:47 UTC