Re: URIs for the standard output and input

On 1/15/08, Weibel,Stu <> wrote:
> > The current rules reflect a desire to have folks think carefully
> > about their need, and if they do find such a need to register
> > the scheme they create to fill it, at least provisionally, so
> > that the broader community is aware that they have done so.
> It would appear that the some people (I'm not speaking about Ted in
> particular) interpret "thinking carefully" to mean "think about it until
> you agree with me".

The authors requested permanent registration which requires more
review than does provisional registration.  Given the significant
issues that have been raised with the draft, I think it's fine that it
hasn't been registered yet.

Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 20:15:27 UTC