On 1/15/08, Weibel,Stu <weibel@oclc.org> wrote: > > The current rules reflect a desire to have folks think carefully > > about their need, and if they do find such a need to register > > the scheme they create to fill it, at least provisionally, so > > that the broader community is aware that they have done so. > > It would appear that the some people (I'm not speaking about Ted in > particular) interpret "thinking carefully" to mean "think about it until > you agree with me". The authors requested permanent registration which requires more review than does provisional registration. Given the significant issues that have been raised with the draft, I think it's fine that it hasn't been registered yet. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.comReceived on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 20:15:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC