- From: Noah Slater <nslater@bytesexual.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:33:18 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tony Hammond <tony.hammond@gmail.com>, uri@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:26:06AM -0800, James M Snell wrote: > Well stated. std:in, std:out and std:err are perfect; using > http://whatever is ugly and buys us little Well, URI schemes must be registered with IANA. You should contact them to see what they have to say. I would be surprised if they didn't suggest that you use HTTP instead. Given that you only need an identifer, not a protocol hint, there is absolutely no reason to invent a new URI scheme for this. -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:33:27 UTC