W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2008

Re: URIs for the standard output and input streams

From: Noah Slater <nslater@bytesexual.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:33:18 +0000
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Hammond <tony.hammond@gmail.com>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080115153318.GI12624@bytesexual.org>

On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:26:06AM -0800, James M Snell wrote:
> Well stated. std:in, std:out and std:err are perfect; using
> http://whatever is ugly and buys us little

Well, URI schemes must be registered with IANA. You should contact
them to see what they have to say. I would be surprised if they didn't
suggest that you use HTTP instead.

Given that you only need an identifer, not a protocol hint, there is
absolutely no reason to invent a new URI scheme for this.

Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>

"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as
society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:33:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC