- From: Noah Slater <nslater@bytesexual.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:38:38 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:31:27AM +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > win on the cost basis ... one might want to define the std scheme as > extensible by future revision, so that if the future suggests, for example, > the use of file descriptors in URIs we might later get I disagree, there is no reason that I can see why you should invent a new scheme for this when plain old HTTP will do. > std:fd/23 This doesn't make much sense. File descriptors are never refered to using the "std" prefix like STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR. "POSIX" would make more sense in this context, and hence why not just publish an RDF profile that covers all POSIXy resources and use the HTTP URIs associated with that profile? -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 11:38:51 UTC