- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:30:39 -0500
- To: <tbray@textuality.com>, "'Colin Paul Adams'" <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
> > In my XSLT 2.0 processor (Gestalt), I am using URIs to > represent the > > standard output and input streams for consistency of addresssing > > (stdin: and stdout: respectively, with no other lexical > forms - so no > > relative URIs). > > Although if you were going to do this you'd want stderr as > well, and you'd probably like to avoid creating three new URI > schemes, so something like std:in/std:out/std:err or maybe > urn:std:in, etc. would work well. Rather than "std:" wouldn't something like "stdio:" make a bit more sense? OTOH, "stdin:", "stdout:", "stderr:" are more "standard", no pun intended, so I'd wonder it wouldn't make sense to go with them? Just a thought... -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 01:30:58 UTC