Marc Hadley wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:14 AM, Manger, James H wrote: >> >> The syntax is XML-friendly compared to Joe’s. Joe’s uses < > and &, >> which require escaping in XML -- making templates more awkward to read >> and write. < and > are already used as delimiters in HTTP headers, >> particularly the proposed Link-Template header. There may not be a >> clash if < and > only appear inside {…} within a template, but it adds >> some confusion. >> > IMO, this is an important consideration. I think its highly likely that > templates will be embedded in XML documents and having to > escape/unescape delimiters in templates will be a pain. Yes, I already have this problem. But isn't it the case that a URI template even with no variables at all might already suffer from this problem? In other words, isn't this a general issue of putting certain URIs (with a query string containing & for example) in XML documents? But, indeed, perhaps the best that can be done is to limit the damage by making an XML-friendly syntax for template variable names... - John > > Marc. > > --- > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> > CTO Office, Sun Microsystems. > > >Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 14:33:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC