- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:10:16 +1000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
On 20/10/2007, at 1:19 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> At this point, I'm really leaning towards wanting Joe to just
> update the
> spec as he described it in his recent note and just let
> implementors go
> off and do their thing with it for a while.
Given that I have to dig around for that, agreed.
> If and when things start to
> get ugly with regards to naming conflicts, etc, we can revise the spec
> with whatever additional level of complexity proves useful.
I was thinking of just working to make sure that a template name
could be a URI, which is just a syntactic change; the other stuff
could be hung onto that at a later date, if necessary.
E.g., we could say that if a var name is surrounded by quotes, it can
contain any URI-legal character, a la:
{,&|name,"http://example.com/location",age}
Simple, and gives us some wriggle room down the road.
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:12:13 UTC