Jeremy Carroll scripsit: > Any thoughts? > Which way should we rationalize behaviour? > Should we be working on an I-D for file: ? The trouble is that a file: ID would have to document and explain the various inconsistent ways in which file: is already being used. To paraphrase Tennesee Ernie Ford: When you see file: coming, better step aside, A lotta men didn't, and a lotta men died. One way for Explorer, another for Mozill', If the right hand don't a-getcha then the left one will. -- The Unicode Standard does not encode John Cowan idiosyncratic, personal, novel, or private http://www.ccil.org/~cowan use characters, nor does it encode logos or graphics. cowan@ccil.orgReceived on Thursday, 4 October 2007 14:02:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:50 UTC