- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:41:14 +0100
- To: uri@w3.org
Charles Lindsey wrote: > There has been (one-sided) discussion of it on the ietf-nntp list Yes, a bunch of proposals to overrule STD 66 already discussed here a year ago. A proposal to introduce new features for "news" also discussed here a year ago: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.uri/969> (2006-12-05) The I-D tries to reflect what I think a majority of folks actually wanted. Admittedly I also agree with... | we came to what seemed to me to be a policy question of whether | URI schemes are better off defining all of the options one might | want to use [...] or to intentionally limit the syntax to things | that can be trusted to be implemented by most all interpreters. <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.uri/1182> (2007-09-21) > If it goes to IETF Last Call in its present state, I shall object > vigorously. Maybe that will help to get new opinions. There weren't that many opinions wrt "wildmat" URIs (four, IIRC). Frank
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 13:45:29 UTC