- From: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:52:14 -0500
- To: "James M Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
On 11/8/07, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> wouldn't that be:
>
> {-join|&|num} // 0 or 1
> {-join|&|num+} // 1
> {-listjoin|&num=|nums} // 0 or more
> {-listjoin|&num=|nums+} // 1 or more
Yes,
> Several more questions:
>
> * I assume that {-join|&|start,count} resolves to "start=foo&count=bar"
> and not "&start=foo&count=bar" (note the leading & in the latter).
Yes.
> * I also assume that the ordering of the var's in the -join is
> insignificant? e.g. given {-join|&|start,count} the results
> "start=foo&count=bar" and "count=bar&start=foo" are equivalent and
> acceptable.
Yes.
> * Given {-opt|?|tags,start,count}, the ? is inserted if at least one of
> the members of the set is defined. That is, if tags is defined but
> start and count are not, the ? will still be inserted.
Yes.
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:52:30 UTC