- From: Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 02:26:14 +0200
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- CC: uri@w3.org
John Cowan wrote: > You can refer to STD 66. This is a logical name for whatever the current > RFC for URI Syntax may be. Note that only a few RFCs have STD numbers: > the list is at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html . --------------------------------------------------------------- As I undertand you we should have written STD 66 in the XSPF spec. Any ideas what to do with the fact that unfortunately we did not? Sebastian
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 00:26:22 UTC