- From: Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:24:36 +0200
- To: uri@w3.org
Hello! I have an URI-related problem here that I would love to hear some advice to: == Intro == XSPF [1] is an XML-based playlist format using URIs to list locations of a track. The specification references the obsoleted RFC 2396 when talking about URIs. == Problem == The XSPF v1 spec [2] requires URIs to be RFC 2396 [3]. As you know that RFC was superseded by RFC 3986 which now includes IPv6 for example. The question now is whether URIs with a IPv6 address should still make valid XSPF v1? Should the reference to RFC 2396 in the XSPF spec be read as "the latest RFC for URIs"? I think XSPF should follow the best-practice way for dealing with RFC updates. Can you tell me what it is? Thanks in advance for any enlightenments. Sebastian [1] http://www.xspf.org/ [2] http://www.xspf.org/xspf-v1.html [3] http://www.xspf.org/xspf-v1.html#rfc.section.2.3.1
Received on Sunday, 8 July 2007 23:30:27 UTC