- From: McDonald, Ira <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:51:56 -0800
- To: "'Larry Masinter'" <LMM@acm.org>, "'Tim Kindberg'" <timothy@hpl.hp.com>, "'Erik Wilde'" <net.dret@dret.net>
- Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org, Bennett.Marks@nokia.com, "'Ted Hardie'" <hardie@qualcomm.com>, 'Antti Vähä-Sipilä' <antti.vaha-sipila@nokia.com>, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com, alastair_angwin@UK.IBM.COM, Ileana.Leuca@cingular.com, martti.ala-rantala@nokia.com, Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it
Larry Masinter wrote:
>
> There's a problem with using full 'gstn-phone' from 3601
> in the 'sms-recipients' field, because if you trace
> back in the RFC 3601 BNF, if you trace through the
> BNF, the character # is allowed in DTMF,
> which is allowed in phone-string, which is
> allowed in local-phone, etc.
> allows '#' in DTMF, and DTMF is part of 'phone-string'
> which is allowed in 'dial-number', etc.
>
> Maybe you would be better of sticking to RFC 2806
> ("URLs for telephone calls") syntax and using
> 'telephone-subscriber'.
Please note that RFC 2806 is OBSOLETED by RFC 3966 which
makes substantial changes and is NOT backward-compatible
with RFC 2806.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 19:00:48 UTC