Hi Martin, cc'ing to uri@w3.org, I saw a minor issue in http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-duerst-mailto-bis-01.txt: The security considerations of [RFC3986], [RFC3490], [RFC3491], and also apply. [RFC3987] should mayb be The security considerations of [RFC3986], [RFC3490], [RFC3491], and [RFC3987] also apply. Also, I am wondering about this from text from RFC 3987: The security considerations discussed in [RFC3986] also apply to IRIs. In addition, RFC 3987 cites 3940/1. Would it then not be enough to cite the security conciderations from 3987? Am I missing something, which is not in RFC 3987 cited from 3986 / 3490/1? Or is it just normal to have such overlaps in citations? Best regards, FelixReceived on Monday, 7 November 2005 07:26:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:48 UTC