- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:20:40 +0100
- To: uri@w3.org
[Excerpted from another email, with different subject]
Looking at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-04.txt:
I can't see anything in the ftp: draft to suggest how ftp:/// should be
interpreted (i.e. with an empty authority field). The only hint I see that
it is a legal ftp: URI is in the broad-brush statement:
[[
An FTP URL follows the standard syntax described in
draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis [2396bis].
]]
which implicitly, by omission of any contrary qualification, permits ftp:///.
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Saturday, 14 May 2005 08:20:06 UTC