- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:43:51 -0400
- To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:57:27AM -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: > There were some fairly strongly stated opinions that we should > try harder to avoid "multiple registrations", even of provisional > schemes. If that's the concensus position that's ok by me. I agree it will be a rare event anyhow. > This was intended. Do you know any instances where we've actually had > multiple, completely different uses of the same scheme name? If there > are just variants, we should just update the registration rather than > have multiple conflicting registrations. Ok. FWIW, the only duplicate scheme I've heard about was mms; http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes/mms Thanks Larry. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 19:43:06 UTC