W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2005

RE: Proposed Status Categories for URI Scheme registry

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:24:51 -0600
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1106609091.5075.73.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:11 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
[...]
> > An informative reference to the Architecure of the WWW would be nice  
> > addition.
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/
> 
> I'm not sure what kind of reference to give. 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-registration (section 2.4.1)
> references RFC2716 and 2717, which this document intends to update.
> 
> I like the reasons for not using unregistered schemes; I also like the
> advice against using new URI schemes when a new content-type
> would do.
> 
> I think, though, it would be good to include these in draft-hansen-etc
> directly, and acknowledge webarch in the acknowledgements.

Very well, yes, please do.

And thanks for narrowing down the pointer to webarch and finding
the relevant bits.

> 
> Larry
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 23:24:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:08 UTC