Re: FW: Last Call: 'Domain Name System Uniform Resource Identifiers' to Proposed Standard

On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 09:56 -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Should the process document request that the "last call"
> announcement for documents defining permanent URIs be sent to
> the URI review list?

Yes, I suppose so.

Which is the URI review list?

At some point, I made a link to

https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/uri-review/current/maillist.html

but that has since gone 404.

google finds
  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

hmm... lots of spam... hmm... discussion of closing it
 http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review/current/msg00298.html


Is this discussed in draft-hansen? Ah, yes...


   3.  If desired, send a copy of the template or a pointer to the
       Internet Draft (and containing section number) to the mailing
       list uri-review@ietf.org; participate in the discussion and
       review of the URI scheme; allow a reasonable period (at least 2
       weeks) for discussion and comments.

  http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines/


So I guess that's where we are. OK.

Please let's add the address of the HTTP archive of uri-review@ietf.org
to draft-hansen, i.e. a commitment from the IETF to hold this part
of the web site still, or at least leave redirection cookie-crumbs
when it moves.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 18:53:05 UTC