Re: Duplication of provisional URI namespace tokens in 2717/8-bis

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:54:21 -0600, Dan Connolly <> wrote:

> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:47 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote:
>> They clearly are related, but they are different requirements and
>> distinct mechanisms for coping with them can be elaborated.
> Maybe I'm just not very creative, but I don't see how.
> An example of how to address the land-grab problem without
> allowing duplicates would make your point much easier
> for me to see.

What you need is a mechanism for _removing_ registrations from the
registry (what does the present draft say about that?). Otherwise none of
the current duplicates could _ever_ proceed to permanent.

One you have a removal mechanism, then you also need some mechanism for
forced removal, under some IESG procedure, for use as a last resort
against the land grabbers and the defunct schemes that "seemed like a good
idea at the time", but never made it into actual use.

Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web:
Email:      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 11:27:59 UTC