On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 14:48 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote: [...] > Dan, you say you don't understand why the current proposal is not > workable... I don't understand why anyone on this list thinks that > leaving the uniqueness of URI tokens as indeterminate is an acceptable > position. The current draft doesn't leave uniqueness of URI tokens as indeterminate, as I understand it. Permanent registrations are unique. > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines/ > January 3, 2005 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:07:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:47 UTC