W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Addressing the name speculation problem

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:07:16 -0600
To: "Weibel,Stu" <weibel@oclc.org>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1108498036.4991.493.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 14:48 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote:
[...]
> Dan, you say you don't understand why the current proposal is not
> workable... I don't understand why anyone on this list thinks that
> leaving the uniqueness of URI tokens as indeterminate is an acceptable
> position.

The current draft doesn't leave uniqueness of URI tokens as
indeterminate, as I understand it. Permanent registrations
are unique.


> http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines/
> January 3, 2005

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:07:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:09 UTC