- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:07:16 -0600
- To: "Weibel,Stu" <weibel@oclc.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 14:48 -0500, Weibel,Stu wrote: [...] > Dan, you say you don't understand why the current proposal is not > workable... I don't understand why anyone on this list thinks that > leaving the uniqueness of URI tokens as indeterminate is an acceptable > position. The current draft doesn't leave uniqueness of URI tokens as indeterminate, as I understand it. Permanent registrations are unique. > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines/ > January 3, 2005 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:07:18 UTC