- From: Weibel,Stu <weibel@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:59:50 -0500
- To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>
- Cc: <uri@w3.org>
Larry wrote: I think that your proposal is basically to take hansen-permanent and split it into weibel-permanent and weibel-provisional, and map hansen-provisional to weibel-vernacular. if you agree with this analysis: I think it is important that the levels that require review also assure uniqueness among those schemes that have passed review; I also think that we should be very careful about what guarantees for short names whose registration haven't passed any review. ----- Yes, I think you have characterised my position accurately, and I think your concern is well founded and should be addressed in any process.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2005 20:02:56 UTC