Larry wrote: I think that your proposal is basically to take hansen-permanent and split it into weibel-permanent and weibel-provisional, and map hansen-provisional to weibel-vernacular. if you agree with this analysis: I think it is important that the levels that require review also assure uniqueness among those schemes that have passed review; I also think that we should be very careful about what guarantees for short names whose registration haven't passed any review. ----- Yes, I think you have characterised my position accurately, and I think your concern is well founded and should be addressed in any process.Received on Friday, 4 February 2005 20:02:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:47 UTC