- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:23:28 -0400
- To: uri@w3.org
- Cc: xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org
An issue has been raised with Xerces's schema validation of certain kinds of URIs that appear to be legal in 2396 and illegal in 3986. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1060 for details. Briefly it appears that an indefinite number of colon and @ characters were allowed in reg-names in RFC 2396 and forbidden in RFC 3986. This doesn't seem to be called out as a change in D2 of 3986. For instance, dcp.tcp.pft://192.168.0.1:1002:3002?fec=1&crc=0 is legal in 2396 and not in 3986. Was this decision deliberate? Or did it accidentally fall out of other changes made to the BNF grammar? Or am I missing something obvious, and this URI is legal (or illegal) in both RFCs? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 16:23:31 UTC