RE: URLAUTH

From: Eric Burger <eburger@brooktrout.com> · Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:50:21 -0500

Actually, there will be one more draft, adding back the concept of an
anonymous account.  Other than that, it will be as presented in the
document.

Comments welcome to the lemonade list:

Information, subscription management, HTML archive:
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:10 AM
> To: uri@w3.org
> Subject: URLAUTH
> 
> 
> 
> Haven't seen mention of this here yet;
>      
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lemonade-urlauth-03.txt
> 
> >    This document describes the URLAUTH extension to the Internet
> >    Message Access Protocol (IMAP) (RFC 3501) and the IMAP URL Scheme
> >    (IMAPURL) (RFC 2192).  This extension provides a means 
> by which an
> >    IMAP client can use URLs carrying authorization to access limited
> >    message data on the IMAP server.
> 
> E.g.,
>     
> imap://joe@example.com/INBOX/;uid=20/;section=1.2;urlauth=subm
> it+fred: 
> internal:91354a473744909de610943775f92038
> 
> See also:
>    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03nov/slides/lemonade-1.pdf
> 
> If I read the list correctly, it's in last call.
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 