Re: info scheme has no authority component, why?

Roy T. Fielding scripsit:

> No, it has has an arbitrarily different syntax that serves the same
> purpose as the authority component in the generic syntax.  The urn
> scheme has one as well -- that has proven to be a bad idea.

Can you elaborate on this latter point?  My objection to info: has
been precisely that it should be split up into a number of urn: schemes.

Knowledge studies others / Wisdom is self-known;      John Cowan
Muscle masters brothers / Self-mastery is bone;
Content need never borrow / Ambition wanders blind;
Vitality cleaves to the marrow / Leaving death behind.    --Tao 33 (Bynner)

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 07:13:04 UTC