- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:35:49 -0700
- To: "'Tim Kindberg'" <timothy@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, hardie@qualcomm.com
- Cc: "'sandro hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>, "'tim Kindberg'" <timothy@hpl.hp.com>, agenda@ietf.org, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
> > 2. Revise "Guidelines for URI schemes" (RFC 2718) > > Update "vnd and prs Trees" > > draft-king-vnd-urlscheme-03.txt > > Discussion of problematic schemes. > > (Ted Hardie) > > Could you clarify the meaning of "problematic" -- for whom: the > registrants experiencing the IETF's processes, or the IETF, > the W3C, or a combination of those? Will 'tag' be included? My goal was to have an open discussion about why some schemes seemed to be controversial or difficult, and what the nature of the problems might be. I would hope to avoid any significant discussion of any individual scheme, except perhaps as an example. Larry
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 18:42:30 UTC