Re: 255 character limit in reg-name

On Friday, July 16, 2004, at 12:29  AM, Dave McAlpin wrote:
> It's a good point about buffer overflows, but with the current 
> language about registered names, the 255 character limit seems really 
> arbitrary. Could we remove the hard restriction in the BNF and handle 
> it as a normative SHOULD, justified with your text below?

Okay, done.


Received on Friday, 16 July 2004 18:50:26 UTC