Re: grammar fix for path

On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, at 07:37  AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
> The spec currently says
> "The ABNF requires five separate rules to disambiguate these cases,
> only one of which will match a given URI reference."
>
> I think the "in" in your explanation would help quite a bit;
> the spec would then read:
> "The ABNF requires five separate rules to disambiguate these cases,
> only one of which will match in a given URI reference."

Fixed with a bit more verbage, thanks.

....Roy

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 15:03:37 UTC