Just checking: pct-encoded in IPvFuture? from Graham Klyne on 2004-02-17 (uri@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:31:59 +0000
To: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040217173026.00b8b8c8@127.0.0.1>

I note that pct-encoded is now permitted in a reg-name, but not in an 
IPvFuture literal.  This is as intended?

For information, I've re-implemented my parser based on the revised 
grammar, and it passes my existing 294 parser test cases.  I've yet to do 
the relative URI and normalization tests.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 13:18:32 UTC