- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:36:08 +0000
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
Accepting the rest of your rationale, I'd like to check this... At 17:13 15/02/04 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >So, the answer is that the syntax is no longer restricted to that >of DNS (as is true in practice), that percent-encoding within >the name syntax must represent UTF-8 if it is ever used (for future >compatibility), and the specification prose says that implementers >should use the syntax of DNS for globally-scoped names. Do you mean DNS here (which places very few restrictions on the syntax) or that indicated by the Internet host requirements (RFC1122/1123 and friends)? #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 12:44:43 UTC