W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2004

Re: #foo URI references

From: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:45:50 -0500
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040203214550.GW2765@skunk.reutershealth.com>

Roy T. Fielding scripsit:

> Under no circumstances does a valid same-document link under RFC 2396
> become an other-document link under rfc2396bis.

Okay, Paul, I'm sold: no problems here.

John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 16:46:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC