- From: Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:34:59 -0500
- To: uri@w3.org
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
On Mon December 6 2004 12:00, Graham Klyne wrote: > >Are there any implementations using the ABNF as specified in the draft? > > My Haskell implementation [1] is hand-coded, but attempts to follow the > given syntax very closely. But my approach is top-down, not LALR, so that > probably doesn't answer your question. Thanks for the pointers, but you're right that it doesn't answer my question. My concern is with the specification of the grammar, which I believe to be incomplete (and therefore unimplementable as an LALR parser in a manner which guarantees interoperability) as there is no specified set of precedence relationships necessary to resolve the existing conflicts (ideally, there are no conflicts in a well-designed grammar).
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 18:35:59 UTC