- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:40:31 -0400
- To: uri@w3.org
At 6:58 PM +0100 8/27/04, Charles Lindsey wrote: >On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:22:25 -0400, Al Gilman ><Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org> wrote: > >>At 7:20 PM +0100 8/26/04, Charles Lindsey wrote: > >>>I have now proposed some syntax. >> >>Yes, thank you. >>>When we are agreed on that, then some semantics could follow. >> >>[Not sure I would think we can 'agree on' syntax without agreeing >>on semantics. >>My religion says model first, then bind to syntax. Not sure it matters.] > >Well Paul's syntax was so badly broken that it needed to be mended first :-(. To set the record straight, I claim responsibility for everything broken in that grammar. Allowing the server info into the news: scheme was the driver and I got carried away with renovations. Al
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 21:44:16 UTC