- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 18:35:23 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
- Cc: uri@w3.org
At 16:52 01/04/04 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >On Thursday, March 25, 2004, at 10:38 PM, Mike Brown wrote: >>All but one of my test cases for a regex-based parser are passing with >>the new >>grammar, using trailing '?'s instead of the weird path-empty expression. >> >>The URI reference '::' (without the quotes): permitted or not? >> >>It was permitted in the previous drafts, but maybe that was an oversight? > >It was not permitted by RFC 2396. I don't think it would be consistently >interpreted in practice, so I prefer making it invalid. Currently, my tests show that as a valid relative URI, but I haven't yet updated to the very latest proposed syntax. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 15:58:46 UTC