W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2003

Re: uri, urn and info

From: Michael Mealling <michael@neonym.net>
Date: 15 Oct 2003 12:05:10 -0400
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library \"of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
Cc: uri@w3c.org
Message-Id: <1066233910.24472.81.camel@blackdell.neonym.net>

On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 11:49, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > So the authors of the 'info' scheme are telling the LOC that once it has
> > registered the 'lccn' scheme below 'info' that it cannot then register
> > it as its own top level URN NID?
> Well I'd put it this way: the authors of 'info' aren't planning to register
> lccn without LC approval. And if lccn goes that way, LC is not going to then
> register lccn as a urn nid.

So the next question becomes:

Why would LOC consider registering LCCN below 'info' as opposed to a
full URN NID?

Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 12:05:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC