W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Announcement: The "info" URI scheme

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:41:29 -0400
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)" <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <87wubm153q.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> was heard to say:
[...]
| I think
| it would be helpful to address the observation, made by one looking
| from outside, that there seem to be substantial areas of overlap
| between several of the proposed and existing URI schemes.  I suspect
| that I will not be the only one wondering about this. Let us consider
| the case, as a thought-experiment, where the IETF confers its blessing
| on each and every one of these schemes.  In this case, it would be
| tremendously helpful if there were a short taxonomic guide for
| newcomers to aid in selecting schemes for the URIs they might be in a
| position to mint.
|
| In fact, if it were up to me I wouldn't let this whole thing go a step
| further until such a thing existed.

+1.

In addition, such a classification would perhaps aid in the
discussions. It might, at least, put some of our disagreements in
sharper relief.

| It would be interesting if there
| were significant classes of resources for which more than one
| competing URI scheme claimed to be the appropriate choice.  I'd
| probably be OK with that, within reason.

Given that some would no doubt claim http: covers the whole row or
column that it occupies in the table, some overlap is guaranteed.

I've long held the view that there is an important distinction to be
made between names and addresses, but I also find in recent years that
I've simply been using http: URIs for both. I'm not yet sure if this
is the result of exhaustion, sloppiness, or change of heart on my
part.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Throughout history the world has been laid
XML Standards Architect | waste to ensure the triumph of conceptions
Web Tech. and Standards | that are now as dead as the men that died for
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | them.--Henry De Montherlant
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE/fdDpOyltUcwYWjsRAoO5AJ0Urh3Czi7huk9JdoJLZSjgqge4gwCeLmZz
TnsZQDS57FAg6inWRr5naUY=
=FUPG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 15:42:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:06 UTC