- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 22:59:38 -0400
- To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
- cc: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net>, uri@w3.org
> meta:<secure-URI>:<metadata>
>
> So doing something simple and recognizable for secure URIs doesn't preclude
> a "meta" scheme for more general metadata.
>
>
> Comments? Counter-arguments? (or if people agree, it might be interesting
> to discuss the "meta" scheme in a separate thread.. It would be
> particularly interesting to hear what people with more knowledge of
> Semantic Web or other metadata projects think)...
I suggested a strawman RDF-based scheme a few days ago in another
thread [1], but perhaps it wasn't recognizable to everyone as a
generalization on the secure and meta schemes.
Maybe my horizons are too short, but it's hard for me imagine new
schemes like this actually catching on, so I'm hesitant to really work
on such a thing.
-- sandro
Sandro Hawke, W3C Lead Semantic Web Developer
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003May/0007.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 07:31:38 UTC